Intertranslating Counterfactuals and Updates
نویسندگان
چکیده
We recall that the Ramsey Rule can be seen as axiomatising the relationship of inverse accessibility relations which exists between the notions of update and counterfactual conditional. We use this fact to translate between postulates for updates and postulates for counterfactuals. Thus, Katsuno/Mendelzon's postulates U1{U8 are translated into counterfactual postulates C1{C8 (theorem 6), and many of the familar counter-factual postulates are translated into postulates for updates (theorem 7). Our conclusions are summarised in table 5.
منابع مشابه
Counterfactuals and Updates as Inverse Modalities
We point out a simple but hitherto ignored link between the theory of updates and counterfactuals and classical modal logic: update is a classical existential modality, counterfactual is a classical universal modality, and the link between the two (called the Ramsey rule) is simply the link between two inverse accessibility relations of a classical Kripke model. 1 I n t r o d u c t i o n B a c ...
متن کاملCounterfactuals and Updates as Inverse Modalities (preliminary Version)
We point out a simple but hitherto ignored link between the theory of updates and counterfactuals and classical modal logic: update is a classical existential modality, counterfactual is a classical universal modality, and the link between the two (called the Ramsey rule) is simply the link between two inverse accessibility relations of a classical Kripke model.
متن کاملLearning without Counterfactuals
In this paper we study learning procedures when counterfactuals (payo s of not-chosen actions) are not observed. The decision maker reasons in two steps: First, she updates her propensities for each action after every payo experience, where propensity is de ned as how much she prefers each action. Then, she transforms these propensities into choice probabilities. We introduce natural axioms in ...
متن کاملCounterfactuals in Logic Programming with Applications to Agent Morality
Computational morality is an interdisciplinary field emerging from the need of imbuing autonomous agents with the capacity for moral decisionmaking. This paper supplies a computational model, via Logic Programming (LP), of counterfactual reasoning of autonomous agents with application to morality. Counterfactuals are conjectures about what would have happened, had an alternative event occurred....
متن کاملWhich Counterfactuals Matter? A Response to Beck
In our article (Weisberg & Gopnik, 2013), we construct a unifying theory of imaginative processes, in which counterfactuals and pretend games share an underlying cognitive capacity. This theory allows us to explain why children pretend, why they create fantastical pretend worlds, and how pretend play and counterfactual reasoning can help children to learn about the causal structure of reality. ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1996